Court of International Trade Order on IEEPA Duties – What Importers Need to Know

Overview

On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, concluding that the additional duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were unlawful.

Following that decision, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued an important order in Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc. v. United States confirming how the ruling must be applied to import entries.

The order clarifies that the Supreme Court’s decision applies broadly and establishes how U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) must treat entries that were previously subject to IEEPA duties.

Key Takeaways from the CIT Order

1. IEEPA duties are unlawful for all affected importers

The Court confirmed that the Supreme Court ruling applies to all importers of record whose entries were subject to IEEPA duties, not only to the named plaintiff in the case.

This means the decision has broad applicability across the importing community.

2. The Court of International Trade has nationwide authority

The Court emphasized that:

The Court also clarified that the Supreme Court’s limitation on “universal injunctions” in Trump v. CASA does not restrict the CIT, because Congress designed the court specifically to ensure uniform application of customs laws.

3. Uniform treatment of duties is constitutionally required

The Court highlighted the Constitution’s requirement that customs duties be uniform throughout the United States.

Allowing some importers to recover IEEPA duties while others could not would violate this principle.

4. Consolidation of cases

The Chief Judge of the CIT has assigned all IEEPA refund-related cases to a single judge, reducing the likelihood of inconsistent rulings within the court.

What the Order Requires CBP to Do

The CIT issued specific directives to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding entries affected by IEEPA duties.

Unliquidated entries

Liquidated but not final entries

These directives are mandatory and immediate, subject to standard liquidation finality rules.

Practical Considerations for Importers

Importers should consider the following actions:

1. Identify affected entries

Review entry records to identify shipments that:

2. Monitor liquidation activity

Importers should monitor entry activity for:

Any liquidation that still includes IEEPA duties may require review.

3. Preserve rights for final entries

The CIT order does not automatically reopen entries that are already final.

Importers with final entries should evaluate whether:

Operational Considerations for Brokers

Customs brokers may wish to:

Next Steps and What to Expect

While the CIT order provides clear direction, operational implementation will depend on CBP guidance.

At this time:

Buckland is actively monitoring developments and will provide updates as CBP releases operational guidance.

How Buckland Can Help

Our team is currently assisting clients with:

If you would like assistance reviewing your entries or understanding how this ruling may impact your imports, please contact your Buckland representative.

Sources: